Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the BEAR LAKE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of BEAR LAKE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to BEAR LAKE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1389P009989ID029001Bear Lake6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.8502769,-111.9077759
1389P010289ID029004Bear Lake6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.7924995,-111.934166
4789P066989ID007003Bear Lake5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.0074997,-111.4316635

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the BEAR LAKE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the BEAR LAKE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BEAR LAKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BEAR LAKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with BEAR LAKE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the BEAR LAKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the BEAR LAKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with BEAR LAKE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ID-2010-08-30-05 | Franklin County Area - 2008

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map units 3 (Picabo-Thatcherflats-Bear Lake) and 12 (Cloudless-Hades) (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area, Idaho; 2008).

Map Units

Map units containing BEAR LAKE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Crooked Creek-Bear Lake complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes105137484826j8hkid67719841:24000
Downata-Bear Lake complex, drained, 0 to 1 percent slopes416443829132s8mid71119831:24000
Bear Lake-Chesbrook-La Roco complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded60B69832389635bkzid71119831:24000
Bear Lake-Downata complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes124232828782s7hid71119831:24000
Bear Lake-Downata-Thatcherflats complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes125224828792s7jid71119831:24000
Bear Lake-Bear Lake, ponded complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes151845415433255lgid71220081:24000
Lago-Bear Lake complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes1281521815431255ktid71220081:24000
Bear Lake-Chesbrook-La Roco complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes16745115433355lhid71220081:24000
Bear Lake-Lago complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes17539015433455ljid71220081:24000
Chesbrook-Bear Lake complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes50106115427055jgid71220081:24000
Bear Lake-Downata complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes141440485231j8xmid71419971:24000
Bear Lake-Downata-Thatcherflats complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes151417485242j8xzid71419971:24000
Merkley-Lago-Bear Lake complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes971213485348j91did71419971:24000
Bear Lake-Lago complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes16480485253j8ybid71419971:24000
Bear Lake, frequently flooded-Lago, rarely flooded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes60C17031733905bl0id71419971:24000
Chesbrook-Bear Lake complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes3781485281j8z7id71419971:24000
Bear Lake-Chesbrook-La Roco complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded60B3531733915bkzid71419971:24000
Bear Lake-Chesbrook-Picabo complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes134485220j8x8id71419971:24000
Bear Lake-Chesbrook-La Roco complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded60B65661591225bkzid7161:24000
Zeegee, occasionally flooded-Bear Lake, frequently flooded-Fury, occasionally flooded, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes970A1327186027620frxid7161:24000
Chesbrook, rarely flooded-Bear Lake, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes173A12311591635bm9id7161:24000
Chesbrook, rarely flooded-Bear Lake, frequently flooded, complex, cool, 0 to 3 percent slopes173AA77722478822fg3bid7161:24000
Thatcherflats, rarely flooded-Bear Lake, frequently flooded complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes835B381601828n67tid7161:24000
Bear Lake, frequently flooded-Lago, rarely flooded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes60C2961591235bl0id7161:24000
Bear Lake, frequently flooded-Bear Lake, frequently ponded, complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes60AA1721591215bkyid7161:24000
Lago, rarely flooded-Bear Lake, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes465CC541592055bnnid7161:24000
Bear Lake, frequently flooded-Lago, rarely flooded, complex, cool, 0 to 2 percent slopes60CC1524369282mstlid7161:24000
Bear Lake silty clay loamBe49151467754xqpmt60019691:24000
Raynesford-Bear Lake complex, rollingRC28041469064xvxmt60019691:24000
Yamacall-Bronec-Bear Lake, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes536D28324200362m77pmt61220111:24000
Bear Lake silt loamBB15736503806jx7tut60419801:24000
Bear Lake silt loam, pondedBC1240503807jx7vut60419801:24000
Bear Lake silty clay loam, saline-alkaliBD960503808jx7wut60419801:24000
Bear Lake silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes5225014802561lpb6wy0411:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the BEAR LAKE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .